Argumentation And Critical Decision Making Pdf
.Argumentation and Critical Decision Making. DescriptionThe first and most thoroughly developed audience-oriented argumentation text, Argumentation and Critical Decision Making presents argumentation as a cooperative, communicative process.This text examines the general principles of argument in a rigorous yet readable manner and then applies those principles to different spheres of life – law, science, religion, business, government, and politics – to explore how conventions of argument change when applied to these real-world arenas. Focusing on the dynamics of decision making and using real-life examples to illustrate principles, Argumentation and Critical Decision Making aims to help readers develop practical argumentation skills within the world of their daily lives.
Table of ContentsPreface.I. Defining Argumentation.Elements of ArgumentationElements of Critical Decision MakingConclusionProject2. Appraising Argumentation.Argumentation and Being ReasonableThe Bases of Reason in ArgumentationSpheresConclusionProject3. Making Sense in Argumentation.Traditional CriteriaNontraditional CriteriaAlternative Dispute ResolutionConclusionProject4. Analysis in Argumentation.Critical Analysis to Find a PropositionCritical Analysis of a PropositionAnalysis of ClaimsConclusionProject5.
Case Building.Preliminary Steps in Case BuildingBriefing ArgumentsDeveloping a Convincing VisionCommunication to Specific Decision MakersConclusionProjectII. The Nature of Arguments.The Model of an ArgumentTypes of ArgumentsDefinitions as ArgumentThe Analysis of ArgumentsConclusionProject7.
Support: Evidence.Forms of EvidenceGeneral Principles for the Use of EvidenceSphere Dependence of EvidenceConclusionProject8. Support: Values.Characteristics of ValuesValues Appear in SystemsGeneral Principles for the Use of ValuesSphere Dependence of ValuesConclusionProject9. Support: Credibility.Characteristics of CredibilityForms of CredibilityGeneral Principles for the Use of CredibilitySphere Dependence of CredibilityConclusionProject10. Refutation.The Process of RefutationApproaching RefutationSetting a Framework for RefutationSelecting a Posture for RefutationCommunicating RefutationConclusionProject11.
Refutation By Fallacy Claim.Views of FallacySocial Guides to Fallacy ClaimsUsing Fallacy Claims in RefutationConclusionProjectIII. Argumentation in Law.Narrative in Legal ArgumentationArguments on the LawConclusionProject13. Argumentation in Science.The Tradition of Argumentation in ScienceScientific Use of Argument TypesScientific Use of EvidenceScientific Method as ArgumentConclusionProject14.
Argumentation in Religion.Major Questions in Religious ArgumentationEvidence in Religious ArgumentationPreferred Argument FormsConclusionProject15. Argumentation in Business.Starting Points for Business ArgumentationForms of Support in Business ArgumentationConclusionProject16. Argumentation in Government and Politics.The Nature of Political ArgumentationRefutation in Government and PoliticsRefutation in Legislative ActionArgumentation in Political CampaignsThe Special Role of DebatesRefutation in the Political CampaignConclusionProjectReferencesName IndexSubject Index.
Critical Decision Examples
The principles of practical reasoning integrated into real world applications is the basic premise behind Professors Richard D. Rieke and Malcom O. Sillars' fourth edition of Argumentation and Critical Decision Making. The most current theories and research are combined with classic rhetoric to effectively explain the necessary functions of decision making in any given situation.
Argumentation And Critical Decision Making Pdf Free
With an increased emphasis on critical thinking, Rieke and Sillars help connect critical decisions with audience values and conventions. Real life examples are used to illuminate the principles of argumentation, ranging from interpersonal discussions to formalized conventions of science and law. A new discussion of language and argumentation highlights language practices that have had the most impact on effective argumentation.